<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: prince caspian &#8212; a film review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandoncozart.com/archives/2008/05/25/prince-caspian-a-film-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandoncozart.com/archives/2008/05/25/prince-caspian-a-film-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://brandoncozart.com/archives/2008/05/25/prince-caspian-a-film-review/#comment-5690</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandoncozart.com/?p=137#comment-5690</guid>
		<description>I'd have to say I disagree with the review.  I really did enjoy the film, and thought it was less awkward, and more well-made than the first.  I don't mind the book though.  I wish they followed the faith journey of Lucy a bit more (as it's a big fan of the book), but I'd be curious to hear exactly in what ways the story was "raped"?  I am not saying it is an exact copy of the story told in the book, but I take your biggest offences to be with the theology of the film and how it has changed.  I'm curious to know some specifics?  In other words, how would say they toned done, removed or perverted the spiritual messages of the story?

You can read my review of the film here if you are interested.

http://www.bodycreativenetwork.com/index.php/2008/05/prince-caspian-well-worth-the-wait/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to say I disagree with the review.  I really did enjoy the film, and thought it was less awkward, and more well-made than the first.  I don&#8217;t mind the book though.  I wish they followed the faith journey of Lucy a bit more (as it&#8217;s a big fan of the book), but I&#8217;d be curious to hear exactly in what ways the story was &#8220;raped&#8221;?  I am not saying it is an exact copy of the story told in the book, but I take your biggest offences to be with the theology of the film and how it has changed.  I&#8217;m curious to know some specifics?  In other words, how would say they toned done, removed or perverted the spiritual messages of the story?</p>
<p>You can read my review of the film here if you are interested.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bodycreativenetwork.com/index.php/2008/05/prince-caspian-well-worth-the-wait/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bodycreativenetwork.com/index.php/2008/05/prince-caspian-well-worth-the-wait/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://brandoncozart.com/archives/2008/05/25/prince-caspian-a-film-review/#comment-5685</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandoncozart.com/?p=137#comment-5685</guid>
		<description>the makers of Prince Caspian kept to the original story surprisingly well, all thinks considered... i heard they were going to make it into a silly pure-action flick, but thankfully this was not the case</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the makers of Prince Caspian kept to the original story surprisingly well, all thinks considered&#8230; i heard they were going to make it into a silly pure-action flick, but thankfully this was not the case</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
